Online Forum: February 23, 2011 :: 16:00 - 20:00 GMT
EU Standardization – From Formalism to Pragmatism?

EU Standardization – From Formalism to Pragmatism?

On Wednesday February 23, 4 pm GMT (8 am Pacific, 11 am Eastern, 5 pm CET, 11 pm Beijing) Talkstandards.com will host an online open forum to discuss the recent EU policy developments related to Standardization and build upon our December 22nd mini-event “European Interoperability Strategy“.

.

December saw the release of two important Communications from the European Commission related to e-Government and standardization:

.

1- Towards Interoperability for European Public Services

To establish a common approach and ICT policy for Member State’s provision of  public services.

ec.europa.eu/isa/strategy/index_en.htm

.

2- Guidelines for the assessment of horizontal cooperation agreements

To promote a standard-setting system that is open and transparent and thereby increases the transparency of licensing costs for IPR in standardization.

ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/
legislation/horizontal.html

.

These represent two of five related initiatives identified by Commissioner Kroes in a speech in June 2010 as steps in implementing the “Digital Agenda.”

.

Issues to be addressed include:

.

• The EIFv2 and EIS provide normative guidance on what needs to be done to foster interoperability, particularly across the semantic and organizational layers.  But how can Member State governments meet these objectives in practice?

.

• The EIF v2 sets out attributes of “open specification” as well as a comment which appears to give public administrations some discretion to reference specifications that do not meet these openness criteria “if open specifications do not exist or do not meet functional interoperability needs.”( Section 5.2.1)  How does this differ from the language in EIF v1 and what are the practical implications of this difference in language?

.

• What are the implications of the endorsement of FRAND licensing within the new guidelines on horizontal cooperation agreements, particularly in the context of standardization?

.

I invite you to take part in the discussion, please contact Junior Editor Peter Gray for additional information/feedback.

.

Mattias Ganslandt, Editor


recent ARTICLES

Summary: EU Standardization – From Formalism to Pragmatism?

Posted By Talkstandards on February 28th, 2011

On wednesday February 23, Talkstandards.com held an online open forum to discuss a number of issues related to recent EU policy developments, building ...

Standardization, Government Policy and the “Consumerization of IT”

Posted By Steve Mutkoski on February 23rd, 2011

The pragmatism with respect to standardization reflected in the EIS and EIFv2 will be an important attribute to these policies in the coming years as g...

Shortlines: The new European Interoperability Framework

Posted By Susannah Sheppard on February 23rd, 2011

This article is co-authored by Susannah Sheppard, Consultant, and Richard Kemp, Senior and Commercial Technology Partner of Kemp Little LLP. This...

FRAND versus Royalty-Free

Posted By Michele Herman on February 23rd, 2011

A number of questions were posed for the upcoming TalkStandards event. This contribution is responsive to the following question: The EIF v2 sets ou...

A Formal Path Towards Interoperability and Standardisation

Posted By Meir Pugatch on February 23rd, 2011

  Sharing standards and achieving greater interoperability between different technology platforms has no doubt helped drive a new level of dyna...

EIFv2 – From Objectives to Action

Posted By George Barker on February 23rd, 2011

In what follows I try to respond to two forum questions posed by the convenor; Question 1: From Objectives to Action: The EIFv2 and EIS provi...

Encouraging Openness and Innovation

Posted By James Bryce Clark on February 23rd, 2011

This article is co-authored by James Bryce Clark, General Counsel, and Laurent Liscia, Executive Director, of OASIS Professor Ganslandt and several ...

European Codes and Guidelines for Standards Processes in a Bilateral and International Context

Posted By George Willingmyre on February 23rd, 2011

Consider that 'EIFv2' and 'Guidelines for the Assessment of Horizontal Cooperation Agreements' are codes and guidelines for types of standards proces...

A More Pragmatic Approach to IPR

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on February 23rd, 2011

The topic of the forum this week is: EU standardization - from formalism to pragmatism? The ‘question mark’ depicts an open ended question which...
recent COMMENTS
  • The interoperability strategy is on another level, a 'strategic' level. It is a negotiations process based on realpolitik principles. You…

    Join the conversation

  • A. Rebentisch- You say "for instance it looks unbearable to mandate citizens to license a standard from a private third…

    Join the conversation

  • Probably not. Procurement and sales reflect opposing interests. Of course you may view citizens as "consumers" which buy services from…

    Join the conversation

  • A. Rebentisch- I think you are just re-enforcing my point. Where in your equation is the citizen? I…

    Join the conversation

  • "Government interoperability policies need to have the pragmatism and flexibility to ensure they continue to evolve to serve the citizen…

    Join the conversation

  • In response to Rebentisch's comment: My point is that it is the duty of the public authority…

    Join the conversation

  • I am stunned by your argument: "The exclusion of FRAND licensing and the insistence on royalty free standards would weaken…

    Join the conversation




An active online community where developers, researchers, policymakers and other interested parties can share ideas and collaborate on the global standards system.