Live Event: May 5, 2009 :: 07:00 - 16:00 GMT
ICT Standards in Application

ICT Standards in Application

Resources, Structures & Cooperation in the Standards Landscape

Brussels, Belgium

There, technology market players, academics and standards experts gathered to discuss the role of standards in supporting innovation while realizing the promise of interoperability.

Two panels where held, focusing on the issues of interoperability though standards and the definition of openness in standards. These provided an opportunity for players such as Motorola, Philips and Microsoft as well as academics, consultants and commentators to express their views about this subject.  Their debate was enriched by an informative contribution by Ms. Anne Lehouck from the European Commission, who explained the views of the European Commission on this issue, including giving background to the forthcoming White Paper on Standardisation, as well as answering questions from participants.

The second panel, “Openness & Standards” was recorded for the purposes of a podcast and a number of Individual podcast interviews with panelists & participants also took place.

You can download or listen to podcasts of the following interviews (in bold text) recorded at the event:

1.  Luc van der Berghe, European Committee for Standardization talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics about what he has taken away from the event “ICT Standards in application”. Luc van der Berghe

2.  Allen Dixon of International Intellectual Property & Technology consulting talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics about focus on and interchange between IPR in standardization. Allen Dixon

3.  Dr. Christopher Stothers of Intellectual Property Institute and also Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy LLP. talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics on what themes he has taken away from the event “ICT Standards in application”.  Christopher Stothers

4.  Jason Matusow, Senior Director of Global Standards Engagement, Microsoft talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics on the lessons he has learned from the event “ICT Standards in application”. Jason Matusow

5.  Ajit Jaokar, Founder of Futuretext & Blogger on “opengardens” talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics on the many definitions of “open”. Ajit Jaokar

6.  Ajit Jaokar, Founder of Futuretext & Blogger on “opengardens” talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics about the most important lesson he has taken away from the event “ICT Standards in application”. Ajit Jaokar

7.  Per Andersen, Managing Director of IDC Nordic & Benelux, Group Vice-president IDC EMEA & author of Report on Open Standardization”, talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics on the different views of standardization that were expressed at the event “ICT Standards in application”. Per Andersen

8.  Dr. Alistair Buttar, Manager, Strategic Programs of Motorola talks to Mattias Ganslandt of Center for European Law & Economics on how he felt a willingness to cooperate that he detected at the event “ICT Standards in application”. Alistair Buttar

9.   Luc van der Berghe, European Committee for Standardization talks to Mattias Ganslandt of European Centre for European Law & Economics about the most important challenges for standardization in the ICT field. Luc van der Berghe

10.  Knut Blind, Chair of Innovation Economics at Berlin University of Technology talks to Mattias Ganslandt of European Centre for European Law & Economics on his view of the European Commission’s efforts on standardization. Knut Blind

11.  Panel 2 “Openness & standards” of the event “ICT Standardization in Application” held in Brussels, Belgium on 5th May 2009. Moderator: Per Andersen (IDC), Panellists: Knut Berlin (Technical University, Berlin), Ajit Jaokar (Futuretext), Allen Dixon (International Intellectual Property & Technology consulting). Openness & standards

recent ARTICLES

Whitepaper on ICT standardization, open source and software makers held liable for code

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on May 11th, 2009

In this blog, I outline two EC initiatives that I follow with interest: A whitepaper on ICT standardization and a proposal to deem software makers liab...

Talk standards: We need to innovate standards but not standardize innovation

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on May 11th, 2009

Background: This blog is a summary of my discussion at the talkstandards forum last week in Brussels. I see both the talk and the event as the con...

The European Commission’s forthcoming White Paper on ICT standardization

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on May 5th, 2009

Several interesting themes can be expected in the European Commission’s forthcoming White Paper on ICT standardisation. This was evident after a spee...

The European Commission's forthcoming White Paper on ICT standardization

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on May 5th, 2009

Several interesting themes can be expected in the European Commission’s forthcoming White Paper on ICT standardisation. This was evident after a spee...

Where Does Competition Do the Most Good? Some thoughts on the many and diverse roles of competition in standard setting

Posted By Anne Layne-Farrar on May 5th, 2009

Mention “competition” and “standard setting” in the same sentence and you’re likely to get a wide assortment of reactions. I offer a few thou...

A Closer Look at ICT Standardization

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on May 4th, 2009

Ten case studies of SSOs for the purpose of better understanding synergies between different types - formal and informal - standard setting organizatio...

Evaluation of Ten Standard Setting Organizations with Regard to Open Standards by Per Andersen (IDC)

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on May 4th, 2009

On 2 June 2006, the Danish parliament (the Folketing) unanimously adopted Parliamentary Resolution B103 on the use of open standards for software in th...

Does an open process promote interoperability?

Posted By Tim Simcoe on May 4th, 2009

Is an “open” standards development the best route to interoperability? It’s hard to say. Certainly, many standards have emerged from Standard ...

Interoperability and standards

Posted By Knut Blind on May 4th, 2009

Innovations need to satisfy interoperability criteria more and more, which is the “ability of information and communication technology (ICT) systems ...

A debate on standards and the evolution of standards: Why is it needed now?

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on May 1st, 2009

Was it Napoleon who said that All my generals are ready and prepared to fight the LAST battle - i.e. they are ready to face the situations they have en...

Patents in Motion: The Troubling Implications of the N-Data Settlement

Posted By Anne Layne-Farrar on May 1st, 2009

A little over a year ago, in January 2008, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced a settlement with Negotiated Data Solutions (“N-Data”) ...

ICT Standards in Application

Posted By Talkstandards on April 29th, 2009

Diverse standards system critical for consumer choice Technology players, policy-makers and experts debate role of standards in boosting innovation...
recent COMMENTS
  • Tim, Interesting points. In terms of rationales for preferring FRAND over more specific ex ante terms, alongside flexibility as mentioned by ...

    Join the conversation

  • Good points, Tim. It is worth noting that, according to the Commission's current thinking, licensing terms and negotiations must be ...

    Join the conversation

  • These seem like a reasonably sound set of principles for European standards policy -- particularly the idea of enhanced "inter-operability" ...

    Join the conversation

  • Tim, Interesting points. In terms of rationales for preferring FRAND over more specific ex ante terms, alongside flexibility as mentioned by ...

    Join the conversation

  • Good points, Tim. It is worth noting that, according to the Commission's current thinking, licensing terms and negotiations must be ...

    Join the conversation




An active online community where developers, researchers, policymakers and other interested parties can share ideas and collaborate on the global standards system.