Online Forum: June 24, 2010 :: 15:00 - 17:00 GMT
Standards Policy in China

Standards Policy in China

Welcome to the Open Forum on the Standards policy in China

Questions to be addressed:

What are the conditions for including Chinese companies in global ICT standardization?

How can the US and the European Union cooperate with the PRC to avoid fragmentation and protectionist standards?

The recent financial crisis has been felt particularly hard in the US and Europe, and as a result we are seeing a shift in the world economy from the G8 to the G20. China in particular is becoming increasingly important globally and is no longer content merely as a source of cheap labor. Growth in GDP during the crisis barely dipped below 10% and with an annual growth rate of 29.7% China is now the world’s fifth largest patent filer .

However, China’s approach to standardization is generally met with considerable negativity from the West. The indigenous innovations policy in particular draws substantial criticism.

The indigenous innovation policy is an effort by Chinese legislators to support and promote domestic Chinese R&D in key strategic industries and reduce China’s reliance on foreign IPR. The view of many commentators is that the policy is excessively protectionist and makes it too hard for foreign firms to operate in mainland China (see e.g. here and here).

Yet policy makers in the PRC appear to be, in part, listening to and taking on board international criticism evidenced by a number of positive steps that have recently been made. Specifically, there have been a number of subtle changes made in regulation such as rules relating to patent inclusions in national standards and foreign IP in public procurement lists, which indicates a move towards a general relaxation of the policy’s requirements placed on foreign firms and standards.

Talkstandards has previously hosted an open forum covering ICT Standardization in China (see here), and as such the focus of this forum is to present an updated picture and of standardization in the People’s Republic of China. Recent developments, as outlined above, will be discussed, as will the effects/consequences stemming from them.

Please join the discussion!

Mattias Ganslandt, Editor

Banner image by West Zest

recent ARTICLES

CNIS Role in Chinese Standardization

Posted By Wang Ping on August 16th, 2010

In this Talkstandards exclusive article Mr Wang Ping, Deputy Chief Engineer, Deputy Executive Governor of Science and Technology Committee, CNIS (China...

Summary of Open Forum: Standards Policy in China

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on June 25th, 2010

In June, Talkstandards.com hosted an open forum which discussed the standards system in the People's Republic of China. A series of articles were poste...

Standardisation Policy in China: A Path from Made-in-China to Innovated-in-China

Posted By Anne Layne-Farrar on June 24th, 2010

This article is co-authored by Anne Layne-Farrar and Vanessa Yanhua Zhang (bio Here) In the past decade, Chinese companies have aggressively i...

Chinese Standardization and the benefits of European led coordination

Posted By Klaus Ziegler on June 24th, 2010

In recent years China’s standardization system has matured considerably. Today, China has more standards than Europe, covering more aspects of ec...

China’s approach to “standardization of the behavior of incorporating patents into standards”

Posted By George Willingmyre on June 24th, 2010

In June 2008, the China State Council officially promulgated the “Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy.” The Outline identified ...

Questions raised by Chinaʼs “indigenous innovation” program: An Overview

Posted By Richard Suttmeier on June 24th, 2010

Chinaʼs interest in developing and implementing a national standards strategy continues to attract widespread international attention. The strategy ...

Standards in a Post China World

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on June 24th, 2010

Newsweek this week featured an interesting article titled: “the Post China World”. On first impressions, it seems odd to be speaking of a "P...

Upgrading China’s Standards system – the challenge of rising complexity

Posted By Dieter Ernst on June 24th, 2010

China has substantially improved its capacity to develop and implement a broad set of interoperability standards, security protocols, and product...

Participating in International Standards Setting Bodies is Better than “Going it Alone”

Posted By Stacy Baird on June 24th, 2010

Through privatization and the transformation to capitalism, Chinese market conditions are evolving apace.  The IT industry has experienced substantial...

China and the Global Standards System: Challenge and Opportunity

Posted By Tim Simcoe on June 24th, 2010

China is on track to become the world’s largest economy some time in the next few decades. This could not have happened without the development and w...

China’s Integration into the System of International Standardisation: A Possible, but Not Guaranteed Win-Win Situation

Posted By Knut Blind on June 24th, 2010

Standardisation has the potential to be an influential instrument in improving China’s economy, society and government in numerous dimensions, so l...

UPDATE: Chinese Regulation of IPR in Official Standards

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on June 15th, 2010

In November last year (2009), the Standards Administration of China (SAC) issued for public comment their “Proposed Regulations for the Administratio...

BACKGROUND: China “Relaxes” Indigenous Innovation?

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on June 15th, 2010

In April, the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) made available for public comment a draft notice outlining a series of proposed changes...
recent COMMENTS
  • Vanessa, You are probably right that "China’s innovation system is still developing and a top-down approach is a pragmatic choice". ...

    Join the conversation

  • China's innovation system is still developing and a top-down approach is a pragmatic choice by the government at the current ...

    Join the conversation

  • Tim, You say: “We don’t have to take that claim at face value (i.e. of course there is some rent-seeking going ...

    Join the conversation

  • Tim: You are spot on, when you say: “when we in the West point out that a “bottom up” approach is ...

    Join the conversation

  • Re Andy comments: >>> If I was Chinese, I wouldn’t be very happy about this. And, as with global warming, I ...

    Join the conversation

  • While I don't always admire China's approach to a variety of areas (e.g., human rights), I am sympathetic to them ...

    Join the conversation

  • Mattias, I think I implied that there was a *claim* of inequity. We don't have to take that claim at ...

    Join the conversation




An active online community where developers, researchers, policymakers and other interested parties can share ideas and collaborate on the global standards system.