The solution to securing future food supply may be found in 30 story high greenhouses. Aside from potentially providing food for the world’s growing population, Vertical farming may also help save the environment. It is a great example of what technological innovation and intelligent solutions can accomplish.

Read More…

Standardisation of ICT solutions is an essential enabler for climate change. Whether it is for infrastructures supported by ICT (buildings, energy networks, logistics…) or ICT infrastructure itself (fixed and mobile networks, data centres, PC’s…and the various applications running on these…), interoperability of ICT products and services enable energy reduction in two ways: firstly by avoiding (or at least reducing) the need for development of interfaces between systems, which themselves require hardware to run, consuming unnecessary energy;
Read More…

-The divergence between material standards and the ethereal world of ICT

We have standards for nearly everything in this green world of ours. There are Green Building Standards (LEED, Green Globes, BREEM, Energy Star, NAHB Green and ASHRAE 189 to name a few)
Read More…

Standardization work is essential to the credibility and scalability of Green IT, and thus for the ICT industry’s ambitions of supplying the world with solutions for combating climate change.
There is much focus today on smart grids. In Sweden, the Zigbee trials demonstrate the necessity for open standards because we want to keep our opportunities open for the new applications that might come. In order for such trials to be economically feasible there must be a perception that smart technology invented in one corner of the world may be used in other corners as well
Read More…

At a time when Climate Control initiatives are getting embroiled in quotas and targets, it is remarkable that the ICT industry has stepped up to the challenge and begun to deliver genuine solutions that reduce CO2 emissions.
Read More…

Throughout the industrialized world legislation for greenhouse gas emissions is being, or will likely be enacted, over the coming years. These programs will introduce significant operational/financial cost impacts as well as opportunities for many industrial sectors.
Read More…

To stabilize and eventually reduce greenhouse gas emissions is an enormous challenge that will require many new technologies, behaviors and business practices . New standards will ensure that these technological systems work together well, and provide end-users with the information they need to make informed decisions. This short post describes a few of the environmental standards initiatives that have already begun.

Conservation is the largest single opportunity for short-run improvements in energy efficiency. In both the US and Europe, “Smart Grids” are touted as a promising conservation tool. The basic idea is to add some digital intelligence to electricity meters and household appliances, so that usage can be more easily, measured, monitored and controlled. Smart Grid technology will also allow some consumers to become energy producers, by selling the excess capacity from their own solar or wind generators back to the electrical grid. In addition to providing basic tools for inter-operability and security, Smart Grid standards must be designed for usability. Experience shows that consumers are unlikely to invest in conservation unless it is extremely easy (or prices increase substantially, bringing some of the long-run savings forward into the immediate future). Andrew Updegrove provides a nice overview of Smart Grid standardization, and the US Smart Grid standards initiative has an easily accessible home page.

Environmental labeling and certification programs are another case of standardization in support of the environment. Many consumers will pay a bit more for environmentally friendly products, but cannot distinguish among options at the point of purchase. This has given rise to a number of eco-certification programs, such as Energy Star for appliances, LEED for buildings, Forest Stewardship Council certification for paper and lumber or a host of different organic food designations. For an overview of eco-labeling, see here. In some cases, such as organic food, the number of labels has grown so quickly that it may be adding to customer confusion, leading to calls for government certified labels such as USDA organic. Assessing the costs and benefits of competing certification schemes is an interesting area for standards-related research.

Finally, since this blog is primarily devoted to ICT standards, we should consider the growing problem of electronic waste. Computers and electronics contain a variety of toxic materials (which are also sometimes quite valuable). Short product life-cycles and poor systems for reclamation cause much of this material to end up in landfills. However, there is growing pressure from groups such as the Electronics Take-back Coalition to push some of the costs and logistics of reclamation back onto electronics manufacturers. This is an area where governments are becoming involved. For example, the EU recently passed the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has endorsed a set of principles for called Responsible Recycling (R2) for accreditation of electronics recyclers. If electronics manufacturers want a voice in these regulatory efforts, they will have to begin developing and adopting new standards for Green designs and more comprehensive take-back policies to facilitate recycling and component re-use.

Governments are playing an active role in all of the standardization efforts described above. However, the most critical policies have little to with the standardization process itself. The value proposition for all of these efforts depends on raising the price of carbon to a level where the private and social costs of consumption are roughly equal. When these prices are in place – and let us hope that is soon – the remarkably diverse and adaptive international standards system will begin to deliver a variety of tools for change.

G B Shaw said: The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.

Much of the discussion around Smart Grids is ‘reasonable’. It is mostly oriented towards the existing infrastructure, with the assumption that the existing infrastructure will also have an important role to play in future.

This is a ‘reasonable’ perspective, but what if we were to be ‘unreasonable’? And therefore progressive and also disruptive in the words of GB Shaw?

This article explores the role of customers as creators of energy rather than mere consumers. It explores the creation of a ‘cottage’ industry of Peer to Peer energy producers. In such an ecosystem, the standard would be used to connect the peer producers and the consumers. The standard would be the unifying glue to bring together peer producers with the value being abstracted to higher levels of software and services which create the peer trading ecosystem based on small amounts of energy produced by individuals at ‘home’.

The role of customers as energy producers is a use case for Smart Grids, but it is relatively less explored. And for good reasons; it is disruptive, and it does not really benefit the incumbent providers of energy. But even so, Peer to Peer energy production may be an idea whose time has come.

George Papanikolaou explores this idea further and I summarise some of my thoughts on this discussion

a) The current approach to Smart Grids and Green initiatives is ‘top down’. It predicates infrastructure investment first and needs many players to come together especially large producers of energy.

b) While the traditional approach is beneficial, a more long reaching impact can be realised if we were to empower the customers and create a ‘bottom up’ network of cottage (home) energy producers who create and distribute energy within a social network – and not always for commercial gain. The Internet provides us such a network – but it needs a peer to peer social network to create and distribute energy

c) Producers are unified with the ‘means of production’. This means, the need for an intermediary is reduced. The motivations for the peers may be sustainability and other additional ‘soft’ benefits apart from revenue itself.

d) Energy produced by solar, wind and other means could lead to potential population realignment away from the cities if it is found that small producers are economically viable. This is not as far fetched as it first sounds. The Web has a tendency to commoditize content and services since it tends to make prices globally transparent. However, the Internet cannot commoditize physical goods and energy production will always have a commercial value. Thus, a whole class of middle income energy producers could arise if the methods of production and distribution become economically viable.

To conclude,

I have read Peter Drucker’s books for a long time. In his book the Post Capitalist Society, Peter Drucker says that productivity of nations will arise from infrastructure investments and since many people will no longer be involved in producing goods, the knowledge economy could play an increasing part. The vision of Peer to Peer production of energy brings these ideas together by the ‘ultimate; decentralising of production (to the individual) and by also adding a knowledge component in empowering the individual.

However, the promised benefits of this vision cannot be realised unless we have standards that foster the connectivity and the ecosystem to make Peer to Peer energy production economically viable.

Comments welcome. Happy holidays!

Developments in Green ICT are moving fast, with new innovations continuously springing to surface. Below are some of these recent trends and progresses listed.
Read More…

The ICT sector is an essential part of the EU business climate, employing close to 7 million people and contributing to over 40 % of total productivity growth. Already ICT is influential in almost all other sectors but the Commission’s policies are seeking to increase this level of influence.
Read More…