Smart Grid technology is aimed at creating a more dynamic power grid where users can ‘interact’ with the system and actively control their energy consumption thus reducing costs. It can use digital technology in delivering energy which leads to an increase in reliability and transparency. Ambitions of what Smart Grids can accomplish are grand, but so are the possibilities.
Read More…

Recently, ANSI responded to questions from Congressman Bart Gordan, chair of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, relating to standards and standardization.
Read More…

To what extent antitrust law and the rules of standard-setting organisations may limit the patentee’s right to be granted an injunction based on standard-essential patents has been and continues to be one of the hot topics of patent law debate. The ruling of the German Federal Supreme Court “Orange Book Standard” answers a previously controversial question, thus clarifying the role of the defendant in antitrust cases. But many questions remain, writes Tobias Hahn and Klaus Haft.

Read More…

One of the most significant challenges facing competition policy today is defining the appropriate role of antitrust law within the context of intellectual property right licensing by standard-setting organizations (“SSOs”).  Many commentators believe it is necessary to apply the full force of the antitrust laws, and sometimes special rules that would increase the scope of antitrust, to the standard-setting process in order to adequately oversee what they perceive as a unique opportunity for anticompetitive behavior.  Indeed, antitrust agencies both in the United States and around the world have expressed agreement with the notion that the standard setting process requires strong enforcement of antitrust liability rules in order to ensure efficient outcomes that benefit consumers.  However, this view largely fails to consider the costs of antitrust.  In particular, it fails to recognize the limits of antitrust when the marginal benefit of antitrust enforcement is slight and the potential for erroneous enforcement (“false positives”) and thus, the likelihood that procompetitive behavior will be deterred, is high.  The Supreme Court itself has emphasized repeatedly that the scope of the antitrust laws should be responsive to such a cost-benefit analysis.
Read More…

Photo: Tom Harpel

Following the previous trend of Mobile Healthcare, Smart Grids is another area where previously discrete areas are converging. In this case, it is ICT, Telecoms and Energy. Once again, we have a familiar theme of recession driven stimulus funding driving this space. And again, the same question arises – how do we standardise a domain when it is rapidly evolving, spans multiple traditional domain and has a sense of urgency (in this case – global warming and other ecological considerations)?

Read More…

The history of standards rarely makes the headlines of regular media. One recent exception was the 57th anniversary of the bar code patent (see The Telegraph, Bar code: invention history behind new Google doodle); a technology more known to most of us as UPC or EAN labels on literally every product we buy in grocery stores.

Read More…

A cloudy weather forecast might be just what’s needed for the Internet of things

Nowhere is the issue standardization more complex than with the Internet of things. The Internet of Things would need all devices, globally to interconnect to each other and ‘talk’ with each other. One person could have many connections so it is more than connecting ‘humanity’ – since the Internet of things entails a ‘one to many’ relationship between people and devices

How to standardize this? How should we interconnect these devices?
Read More…

It has been almost 15 years since the Dell consent decree placed firms on notice regarding their obligations to  disclose essential patents in the standard setting process. In the wake of Dell, there has been a huge surge in IPR disclosures. But it is does not seem that all of this disclosure has resolved the uncertainty surrounding IPR in standards. Since Dell, there have been controversies over: what types of IP must be disclosed, and at what stage of the standards process (Rambus); whether commitments are binding on subsequent patent owners (N-Data); and what is meant by a promise to license on Fair Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory terms (Qualcomm).
Read More…

Competition agencies on both sides of the Atlantic have been keen to pursue cases on IPR licensing in standard setting.  In the United States, it is the Federal Trade Commission leading the charge, with the Dell Corporation decision in 1996, the Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) consent order in 2005, the Negotiated Data (N-Data) settlement of 2008, and the long but ultimately unsuccessful Rambus case that came to a close just this year. In Europe, the European Commission also investigated Rambus, picking up the strands laid out by the FTC and reaching a tentative settlement in June of this year. The EC also opened a formal investigation of Qualcomm in 2007 (after two years of “informal” investigation). And at least one European member state has entered the fray, albeit at the court level rather than at the level of the national competition authority, with the IP-Com v. Nokia litigation in Germany.
Read More…

Innovations need to satisfy interoperability criteria more and more, which is the “ability of information and communication technology (ICT) systems as well as, of the business processes they support in order to exchange data and enable the sharing of information and knowledge” (IDABC).
Read More…