Online Forum: July 15, 2010 :: 15:00 - 19:00 GMT
Transparency in EU Standardization

Transparency in EU Standardization

This forum has been extended to four hours, i.e. 5-9 pm CET.

On Thursday July 15th from 3pm GMT (5pm CET / 11am EST / 8am PST), Talkstandards will be hosting an Open Forum set to discuss issues related to Transparency in EU Standardization.

Questions to be discussed include:

• How should European standardization policy be reformed to enhance efficiency?

• Should transparency be a key priority or could alternative measures more effectively improve the current European standardization system?

The policy discussion on a possible reform of European standardization policy has heated up considerably in recent months against the backdrop of the Digital Agenda and as the standardization reviews are discussed in the European Parliament. Central to this debate is the question of whether the European standardization framework is sufficiently able to foster innovation and international competitiveness?

Important issues include:
• the benefits of the European standardization system and its relevance in international standards setting,
• the role of role global consortia,
• cooperation in important areas such as greenIT and eHealth, and
• the participation of SMEs.

One issue discussed in European policy circles is the need to reform the EU system with regard to increasing transparency. This relates to increased visibility of rules which relate to the procedure, work items and participation of standards setting, as well as the disclosure of patents and upfront information regarding licensing fees for technology implementation.

This Open Forum at Talkstandards.com is devoted to this important debate and will build upon our previous forum from September last year (2009) titled Modernizing ICT Standardization in the EU. The forum will present an updated picture of the European standardization landscape with an emphasis towards transparency.

I invite you to take part in the discussion, for additional information/feedback please contact Junior Editor Peter Gray.

Mattias Ganslandt, Editor

Image from Wikimedia Commons, by user: Kae

recent ARTICLES

Summary of Open Forum: Transparency in EU Standardization

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on July 16th, 2010

In July, Talkstandards.com hosted an open forum which covered current issues related to Transparency in EU Standardization. A number of expert contribu...

The Pros and Cons of Transparency

Posted By Mattias Ganslandt on July 15th, 2010

Transparency in standardization has important advantages. It fosters accountability in decision-making, through external and internal review. It also h...

Transparency’s Role in CEN-CENELEC Operations

Posted By Elena Santiago on July 15th, 2010

Transparency is certainly one of the main attributes of European Standardisation. CEN and CENELEC, and their national members (31 countries) constantly...

Improving Access for SMEs

Posted By John Ketchell on July 15th, 2010

As Elena Santiago has mentioned, we are undertaking a major effort to improve access to standards and the standards process for SMEs – in the process...

Trade-Offs related to the Transparency in the European Standardisation System

Posted By Knut Blind on July 15th, 2010

Transparency is a crucial requirement for standardization, requested by the WTO and even more so by all stakeholders involved. The issue of transparenc...

Transparency in EU Standardisation – Response from OASIS, the premier open standards consortium

Posted By Carol Cosgrove-Sacks on July 15th, 2010

This article is co-authored by Laurent Liscia, Executive Director, James Bryce Clark, General Counsel, and Dr Carol Cosgrove-Sacks, Senior Advisor on ...

Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU – The Way Forward

Posted By Ken Krechmer on July 15th, 2010

This EU standardization white paper is a weak attempt to focus on important issues. What is an ICT standard? Is a cell phone battery standard an ICT ...

The European Framework for Transparent Standardisation

Posted By Simon Hicks on July 15th, 2010

I will start first by saying in what role I make this contribution, which is in a personal capacity. I handle ICT standardisation and technology issue...

Transparency in Standardization under EU Policies

Posted By Marcus Glader on July 15th, 2010

In the discussion about appropriate eligibility criteria under a modernized EU standardization policy, it should be considered to what extent the requi...

Reform of Standardization Policy: Building a Risk-Based Regulatory System

Posted By Valentin Nikonov on July 15th, 2010

This article is co-authored by Valentin Nikonov and Lorenza Jachia (see bio here) This statement describes the concept of building a risk-based ...

The Silence of the Chips

Posted By Ajit Jaokar on July 15th, 2010

I have long advocated for transparency especially in the telecoms / mobile space in relation to price plans. There is also a clear need for transpar...

The Dangers of Compulsory FRAND Conditions

Posted By Helen Disney on July 15th, 2010

Everyone is in favour of transparency these days – who can be against the idea of more information getting out there to consumers? So, yes, more tran...
recent COMMENTS
  • ""The Dangers of Compulsory FRAND Conditions: Helen Disney warned that “we should be wary of over-restricting IP-related practices”, with respect to ...

    Join the conversation

  • JBC: My comment regarding PR/lobbying refers to influencing of political (rather than informal and private) processes. Transparency in bureaucracies and ...

    Join the conversation

  • @jbc "I’m not sure that governments cede any of that power; and if they do, I’m not sure standards ...

    Join the conversation

  • Another aspect of transparency can be seen in the policies towards final drafts. Some organizations, like W3C, publish final drafts ...

    Join the conversation

  • Reading Mattias' comments on seeking transparency in "lobbying and PR": how much transparency do you want? How much is ...

    Join the conversation

  • @Rick: "Standards" are often defined as a substitute for public regulation in certain technical fields, driven by market players under ...

    Join the conversation

  • @André: If people are making decisions that will then be the subject of regulation that will apply to me, I ...

    Join the conversation




An active online community where developers, researchers, policymakers and other interested parties can share ideas and collaborate on the global standards system.